R. Kirán.Get in touch
Back

Case study · Scale AI · MoEHE Qatar

National AI Teaching Assistant.

Lead Product Designer on a generative web application for Qatar’s Ministry of Education & Higher Education — a teaching assistant that helps teachers track student progress, identify areas needing attention, and generate curriculum-aligned assignments with AI. Shipped bilingual — Arabic (RTL) and English (LTR) — at national scale, in three months.

Role
Lead Product Designer
Client
Scale AI · MoEHE Qatar
Year
May — July 2025
Status
Shipped at national scale
Teachers AI — Scale AI · MoEHE Qatar
Cover · MoEHE Qatar AI Teaching Assistant

Overview

A central hub for teaching, not a chatbot.

The AI Teaching Assistant is a generative web application designed for the Ministry of Education & Higher Education in Qatar. Its job is to help teachers manage homework more efficiently — but the platform’s real purpose is to serve as a central hub where educators track student progress, identify areas needing attention, and generate assignments with AI.

Three months, end-to-end. Three personas — teachers, students, and Ministry administrators. Two languages running in true parallel. Curriculum-grounded, not improvised.

AI architecture

Trained on the curriculum, not on the internet.

AI engineers trained the underlying models on the Qatar National Curriculum; curriculum experts provided the necessary mappings between syllabus standards and generated content. The result: every AI-generated lesson, homework question and insight lines up with what teachers are actually trying to teach.

AI flowchart — Curriculum & Data feeds student performance and Ministry curriculum into the AI Model, which generates questions through AI Processing and returns assignments + insights into the Teacher Dashboard.
AI flowchart · Qatar National Curriculum

Approach

Four moves, three months.

  1. 01

    Research, then shape

    Led end-to-end product design — user interviews, ideation, IA, user flows, prototyping and testing — alongside business requirements and curriculum-expert input to inform every decision.

  2. 02

    Design system before UI

    Stood up a custom design system (Manara DS, adapted from Radix) before any UI design, so every surface launched on the same component grammar — and so the dev team had a contract from day one.

  3. 03

    Bridge AI to teacher intent

    Translated probabilistic AI outputs into surfaces teachers could trust and act on — concept mastery, AI reliance scores, transparent generation. Insight first; algorithm second.

  4. 04

    Localise to national scale

    Designed bilingual Arabic (RTL) / English (LTR) in parallel — same components, mirrored layouts, curriculum-aligned content. Shipped at Ministry-of-Education scale, not as an afterthought layer.

Research & ideation

Insights, paired with business reality.

End-to-end product design — user interviews and market research through IA, user flows, UI, prototyping and testing. Insights gathered alongside the Ministry’s business requirements to inform every direction.

Research and ideation Figma board — project framing, AI teacher brief, admin flows, low-fidelity wireframes, market research on TutorAI / Jotform / EdTech competitors, and initial mockup concepts.
Ideation board · Market research

Design system

Built the system before the UI.

Adapted from Radix DS for accessible primitives and platform consistency. I started building the system before the UI, shared it across the team, created custom components, and expanded it as new surfaces came online — so designers and engineers stayed aligned and the platform stayed scalable.

Manara DS — color scheme with primary, secondary, palettes; documented component spec sheets for Heading, Tabs trigger, and Chat input with properties, examples, and accessibility variants.
Manara DS · Color, components, documentation

Wireframes

Iterate cheap, ship sharp.

Multiple iteration rounds — team feedback, stakeholder input, and curriculum-expert review — refined the direction before any pixel pushed in high-fidelity.

Low-fidelity wireframes covering teacher dashboard, homework creation flows, and student progress views.
Wireframes · Iterative rounds

Dashboard

Progress, at a glance.

Designed rosters and individual student reports built around concept mastery, practice time, and an AI reliance score. A teacher scanning the screen sees who’s on track, who isn’t, and where to direct attention next.

Teacher dashboard — Curriculum Overview with student roster (concept mastery, practice time, last activity); Weekly Practice Hours grid showing student-level engagement across the curriculum.
Curriculum overview · Weekly practice hours

Human-centred AI

Trust before sophistication.

Instead of leading with the algorithm, I focused on how teachers could trust and act on AI insights. That balance between transparency and simplicity was the thing that drove adoption — clear sources, declared capabilities, no black-box surprises.

AI Assistant chat modal — bilingual Arabic / English greeting, quick action prompts for lesson planning, homework generation, student performance analysis, and engaging classroom activities.
AI Assistant · Bilingual chat modal

Feature · Homework Challenges

Difficulty that follows the student.

AI-generated multiple-choice homework that adapts to student performance and AI Reliance Scores. Teachers stay in control — the AI proposes, the teacher confirms, and the difficulty curve adjusts as the class works through the term.

Homework Challenges feature — AI-generated multiple-choice homework with adaptive difficulty, sequencing, and AI reliance scoring.
Homework Challenges · Adaptive difficulty

Feature · Lessons

Lesson plans, generated from scope.

Teachers input subject and grade; the AI returns a curriculum-aligned lesson plan they can edit, save and share. Same source of truth as the homework engine — the generated content stays consistent across surfaces.

Lessons feature — teachers enter subject and grade level, AI generates curriculum-aligned lesson plans ready to edit, save, and share.
Lessons · Generate by subject & grade

Demos & feedback

Eleven teachers. Three students. Real classrooms.

Clickable prototypes were shared with 11 teachers and 3 students from Qatar — feedback collected on dashboard clarity, the homework-creation flow, and how AI insights surfaced. The insight that mattered most: teachers loved the time saved, but emphasised the need for transparency — understanding how the AI Reliance Score was calculated, and ensuring students weren’t leaning entirely on AI.

Tight timelines meant full usability sessions weren’t possible — but teacher feedback shaped the iterations that shipped, and made sure every feature lined up with real classroom needs.

Outcomes

Praised for humanising AI.

  • Scalable & teacher-friendly

    Simplified assignment creation and progress tracking across the platform.

  • Clear student insights

    Teachers can see learning patterns and identify areas needing attention at a glance.

  • Intuitive AI features

    Made complex AI outputs actionable and understandable — not a black box.

  • Stakeholder approval

    Praised for clarity, scalability, and humanising AI insights. Arabic version designed in parallel.

Bilingual Arabic-RTL / English-LTR shipped in parallel. Stakeholder approval at the Ministry level — not a pilot, a national rollout.

Reflection

What came next.

“Instead of focusing on the algorithm itself, I focused on how teachers could trust and act on AI insights. That balance between transparency and simplicity was key to adoption.”

After the engagement closed, I felt the student-facing app — designed by another team — had usability and design issues worth re-examining. So I rebuilt the concept from scratch using Claude Code and Bolt.new — clearer student flows, more transparent AI support, a cleaner mental model. Not an official deliverable, but the insights were real.

That exploration became aikhala.com — my own independent AI build, shaped by everything I learned designing for a national education platform.